Defining and measuring objective and subjective spinal stiffness : a scoping review
Moses, Joel Ranui
View fulltext online
Citation:Moses, J. R. (2020). Defining and measuring objective and subjective spinal stiffness : a scoping review. (Unpublished document submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Osteopathy). Unitec Institute of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10652/4975
Permanent link to Research Bank record:https://hdl.handle.net/10652/4975
OBJECTIVE: To examine and identify the breadth of definitions and measures of objective and subjective spinal stiffness in the literature, with a focus on clinical implications and research opportunities. DATA SOURCES: Eligible peer-reviewed studies were identified using PubMed, Ebsco health, and Scopus electronic databases. DATA EXTRACTION: Following the 6-step framework by Arksey and O’Malley1 and based on the eligibility criteria, studies that reported definitions and measures of spinal stiffness were collected using a data abstraction form and classified into four themes; biomechanical, surgical, pathophysiological and segmental spinal assessment. Fifteen categories to identify similarities and differences between studies were generated. DATA SYNTHESIS: Among 2121 records that were identified, 333 met the eligibility criteria. There were 299 subjective and objective measures (124 subjective;175 objective measures) and 60 indicators of spinal stiffness. The majority of studies (n = 72%) did not define stiffness and there is no consensus regarding a standardised definition of stiffness in the reviewed literature. CONCLUSION: This review highlights the breadth of objective and subjective measures that are both clinically and methodologically diverse. There was marked variation in the definitions reported in studies. There were no definitions of stiffness provided alongside self-reported or patient-reported outcome measures. Stiffness is a clinically important symptom that may indicate the presence of underlying pathophysiology/disease which has implications for patients’ health outcomes. An important distinction should be made between the patient’s subjective reports of stiffness and this may differ from objective clinical assessments.
Keywords:spine, stiffness, musculoskeletal pain, rehabilitation, biomechanics, osteopathic medicine
ANZSRC Field of Research:110499 Complementary and Alternative Medicine not elsewhere classified
Degree:Master of Osteopathy
Supervisors:Hach, Sylvia; Mason, Jesse
Rights:This digital work is protected by copyright. It may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: Any use you make of these documents or images must be for research or private study purposes only, and you may not make them available to any other person. You will recognise the author's and publishers rights and give due acknowledgement where appropriate.
MetadataShow detailed record
This item appears in
The following license files are associated with this item: