Show simple record

dc.contributor.authorRasheed, E.O.
dc.contributor.authorByrd, Hugh
dc.contributor.authorMoney, B.
dc.contributor.authorMbachu, J.
dc.contributor.authorEgbelakin, T.
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-21T01:54:34Z
dc.date.available2018-03-21T01:54:34Z
dc.date.issued2017-03-26
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10652/4156
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we investigated the reason(s) why natural ventilation is not as popular as air-conditioned or mixed-mode ventilation systems in Green-rated office buildings in New Zealand. To achieve this, we had three objectives. Firstly, we reviewed the Green Star criteria for thermal comfort in office buildings to ascertain which ventilation system the NZ Green Star rating tool promotes. Secondly, we ascertained the perception of occupants in office buildings regarding thermal comfort. This was followed by an interview with building experts regarding factors that affect the use of natural ventilation in New Zealand offices. The findings showed that the NZ Green Star thermal comfort criteria encourage the use of mechanical ventilation over natural ventilation which results in designers opting for air conditioning systems in office designs. We observed that occupants of naturally ventilated spaces were least satisfied with the thermal comfort of their offices when compared with occupants of mixed-mode and air-conditioned offices. This study fulfils the need to encourage the use of natural ventilation in office environments by designers and building owners. Further study on other aspects of the indoor environment quality that is related to naturally ventilated systems such as lighting and noise is required in a bid to ascertain its viability in office environments.en_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherMDPI (Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute)en_NZ
dc.relation.urihttp://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/902en_NZ
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).en_NZ
dc.subjectnatural ventilationen_NZ
dc.subjectGreen Star rating toolen_NZ
dc.subjectthermal comforten_NZ
dc.subjectenvironmental sustainabilityen_NZ
dc.subjectoffice buildingsen_NZ
dc.titleWhy are naturally ventilated office spaces not popular in New Zealand?en_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.date.updated2017-12-05T13:30:09Z
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.3390/su9060902en_NZ
dc.subject.marsden120202 Building Science and Techniquesen_NZ
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationRasheed, E., Byrd, H., Money, B., Mbachu, J., & Egbelakin, T. (2017). Why Are Naturally Ventilated Office Spaces Not Popular in New Zealand?. Sustainability, 9(6), pp.902 (1-16). doi:10.3390/su9060902en_NZ
unitec.publication.spage902 (1-16)en_NZ
unitec.publication.volume9en_NZ
unitec.publication.issue6en_NZ
unitec.publication.titleSustainabilityen_NZ
unitec.peerreviewedyesen_NZ
unitec.identifier.roms60842en_NZ
unitec.publication.place(Basel, Switzerland)en_NZ
unitec.institution.studyareaArchitecture


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in

Show simple record


© Unitec Institute of Technology, Private Bag 92025, Victoria Street West, Auckland 1142