Show simple record

dc.contributor.authorRankin, Keith
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-22T21:30:48Z
dc.date.available2018-02-22T21:30:48Z
dc.date.issued2016-03-23
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10652/4111
dc.description.abstractI am worried that too much of the recent talk around the introduction of a universal basic income has been unhelpful. The concept – defined in 1991 – is still not understood by the politicians and journalists who represent the public's main source of information about policy options. In 1991 I introduced the subject thus: "a universal tax credit available to every adult - the universal basic income (UBI) - and a moderately high flat taxrate", in my University of Auckland Policy Discussion Paper. Through this approach, the basic income can be understood as an alternative form of progressivity of the income tax system, as distinct from the traditional stepwise graduations of income tax rates that we are familiar with. In the newer 'public equity' approach which I have emphasised since 2008, the basic income represents an alternative to income-tax progression rather than a form of progression. It adopts sound equity principles that render the need for tax progressivity redundant. While in monetary terms the result is the same, the public equity concept has the greater capacity to bring about the reconceptualisation of income that twenty-first century economies desperately require. Here I will outline a simple four-step approach to the implementation of the requisite reforms. Any critique of 'universal basic income' needs to address these four steps. I am confident that this implementation programme is immune from any substantial criticism on the usual grounds of affordability and work incentives. It is intellectually dishonest for politicians and journalists to confine their critiques to proposals that are easy targets;proposals that are extreme, unimplementable, or not thought throughen_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherScoop Publishing Ltd.en_NZ
dc.relation.urihttp://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1603/S00396/ubi-as-a-reconceptualisation-of-income-tax.htmen_NZ
dc.rightsCopyright © Scoop Mediaen_NZ
dc.subjectNew Zealanden_NZ
dc.subjectPublic Equity Dividenden_NZ
dc.subjectUniversal Basic Income (UBI)en_NZ
dc.subjectincome taxen_NZ
dc.subjectflat taxen_NZ
dc.subjecttax reformen_NZ
dc.subjectpolicy developmenten_NZ
dc.titleUBI as a reconceptualisation of income taxen_NZ
dc.typeOtheren_NZ
dc.date.updated2017-12-22T13:30:26Z
dc.subject.marsden40212 Macroeconomics (incl. Monetary and Fiscal Theory)en_NZ
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationRankin, K.R. (2016). UBI as a Reconceptualisation of Income Tax. Scoop Community Engagement. Wellington, New Zealand: Scoop Publishing Ltd. http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1603/S00396/ubi-as-a-reconceptualisation-of-income-tax.htm.en_NZ
unitec.publication.titleScoop Community Engagementen_NZ
unitec.peerreviewedyesen_NZ
unitec.identifier.roms61005en_NZ
unitec.publication.placeWellington, New Zealanden_NZ


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in

Show simple record