Show simple record

dc.contributor.authorBehnam, A.
dc.contributor.authorHarfield, T.
dc.contributor.authorKenley, Russell
dc.contributor.editorS. Kamaruzzaman., A. Ali., N. Azmi & S. Lin
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-29T21:15:55Z
dc.date.available2017-06-29T21:15:55Z
dc.date.issued2016-03
dc.identifier.isbn9781510826786
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10652/3831
dc.description.abstractThe paper suggests that ‘management by exception’ is an historical default control mechanism based on the perception of control as a static process. However, increasingly scholars claim that a dynamic and proactive systems model is a more effective form of project control. These findings are the result of an historical desktop research method that analysed content from a small sample of scheduling methods and control approaches found in online and university library resources. The concept of control has historically influenced both visualization and analytics of different scheduling methods for construction project management. This paper focuses on two control ideals; static and dynamic control mechanisms. The overview begins with the description of early graphical scheduling techniques: Gantt charts and Harmonogram. It continues with examples of contributors to scheduling and control that include: CPM, PERT, LOB, Flowline and Location Based Management. The finding of this simple history suggests that change is the constant element for project control mechanisms. An object-based digital environment such as the data-rich building information modelling (BIM) appears to be continuing the change for new scheduling methods and control mechanisms.en_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherEDP Sciences - Web of Conferencesen_NZ
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ The copyright is retained by the corresponding authors.en_NZ
dc.subjectBIM (Building Information Modelling)en_NZ
dc.subjectstatic controlen_NZ
dc.subjectdynamic controlen_NZ
dc.titleConstruction management scheduling and control : the familiar historical overview.en_NZ
dc.typeConference Contribution - Paper in Published Proceedingsen_NZ
dc.date.updated2017-05-10T05:38:02Z
dc.rights.holderAuthorsen_NZ
dc.identifier.doi10.1051/matecconf/20166600101en_NZ
dc.subject.marsden120201 Building Construction Management and Project Planningen_NZ
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationBehman, A., Harfield, T., & Kenley, R. (2016, 7-8 March). Construction management scheduling and control: The familiar historical overview. S. Kamaruzzaman., A. Ali., N. Azmi & S. Lin (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th International Building Controls Conference (pp.754-759). 66. 10.1051/matecconf/20166600101.en_NZ
unitec.publication.spage754en_NZ
unitec.publication.lpage759en_NZ
unitec.publication.volume66en_NZ
unitec.publication.title4th International Building Control Conference (IBCC 2016) / MATEC Web of Conferences Volume 66 (2016)en_NZ
unitec.conference.title4th International Building Control Conference (IBCC 2016)en_NZ
unitec.conference.locationKuala Lumpur, Malaysiaen_NZ
unitec.conference.sdate2016-03-07
unitec.conference.edate2016-03-08
unitec.peerreviewedyesen_NZ
unitec.identifier.roms59833en_NZ
unitec.publication.placeLes Ulis Cedex A, Franceen_NZ


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in

Show simple record