Show simple record

dc.contributor.authorGutnik, B.I.
dc.contributor.authorZuoza, A.
dc.contributor.authorZuozienė, I.
dc.contributor.authorAlekrinskis, A.
dc.contributor.authorNash, Derek
dc.contributor.authorScherbina, S.
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-30T20:22:44Z
dc.date.available2016-06-30T20:22:44Z
dc.date.issued2015-07-31
dc.identifier.issn1648-9144
dc.identifier.issn1010-660X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10652/3458
dc.description.abstractBackground and objective: Somatotyping is helpful in sports in which the body shape could influence the resulting performance. The purpose of this study was to determine the somatotype of high profile Lithuanian athletes in kayaking, basketball and football and to compare between disciplines and with low level sportsmen of the same age. Materials and methods: A total of 72 young male sportsmen aged from 18 to 24 years were divided into three groups (kayakers, basketball and football players). Each group contained almost equal numbers of low level and elite, international level sportsmen. Anthropometric measurements of the players were used to establish somatotypes. Results: The greatest difference was observed in the mesomorphic component of elite kayakers compared to the low profile sportsmen. Mesomorphy could also be used to predict sport ability. The range of mesomorphy for elite footballers was from 0 to 4.6, for basketball players from 4.6 to 5.9, and for kayaking, from 5.9 and higher. Individual groups of elite sportsmen displayed different modes of somatotype. The kayakers were predominantly endomorphic; the basketball players mostly endomorphic and the footballers most often ectomorphic. No distinguishable patterns of somatotype were displayed by the low level sportsmen. Conclusions: Morphometric characteristics of the athlete's body and the fractional somato- type can be used as guiders and markers of the chosen sport and method of training.en_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherElsevieren_NZ
dc.rightsProduction and hosting by Elsevier Sp. z o.o. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_NZ
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 New Zealand*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/nz/*
dc.subjectsomatypeen_NZ
dc.subjectmorphologyen_NZ
dc.subjectathletesen_NZ
dc.subjectanthropometryen_NZ
dc.subjectanthroprometric indicesen_NZ
dc.titleBody physique and dominant somatotype in elite and low-profile athletes with different specializationsen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.rights.holder© 2015 Lithuanian University of Health Sciencesen_NZ
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.medici.2015.07.003.en_NZ
dc.subject.marsden110699 Human Movement and Sports Science not elsewhere classifieden_NZ
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationGutnik, B., Zuoza, A., Zuoziene, I., Alekrinskis, A., Nash, D., & Scherbina, S. (2015). Body physique and dominant somatotype in elite and low-profile athletes with different specializations. Medicina (Kaunus), 51(4), pp.247-252. doi:10.1016/j.medici.2015.07.003en_NZ
unitec.institutionRussian State Medical Research University by Pyrogov (Moscow, Russia)en_NZ
unitec.institutionLithuanian Sports University (Kaunas, Lithuania)en_NZ
unitec.institutionUnitec Institute of Technologyen_NZ
unitec.institutionAIRO-XXI (Moscow, Russia)en_NZ
unitec.publication.spage247en_NZ
unitec.publication.lpage252en_NZ
unitec.publication.volume51(4)en_NZ
unitec.publication.titleMedicina (Kaunus)en_NZ
unitec.peerreviewedyesen_NZ
unitec.identifier.roms58400en_NZ


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in

Show simple record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 New Zealand
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 New Zealand