Show simple record

dc.contributor.authorKenley, Russell
dc.contributor.authorHarfield, T.
dc.contributor.authorBedggood, Julianna
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-31T01:05:12Z
dc.date.available2016-05-31T01:05:12Z
dc.date.issued2015-07
dc.identifier.isbn9781783210718
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10652/3401
dc.description.abstractAustralian states are mandated to provide researchers access to public sector information (PSI) through three legislative mechanisms: Public Sector Information, Public Records and Freedom of Information. In theory open government is possible because digital technologies allow all PSI to be accessible. Thus, construction management researchers should be able to access public construction documents via government Internet sites. However, this pilot study of 30 road projects indicates a gap between theory and practice. An archival method was used to search the online procurement documents of three states; New South Wales, Western Australia and Queensland. The searches aimed to find the five commonly used road construction procurement documents that could be used by construction management researchers for comparative analysis. However, documentation for road projects could not always be found. Analysis of the search process and the type of procurement documents accessed indicates significant open PSI differences in these three states. Discussion of the application of the three types of public sector information access legislation is one way of making sense of the variability of access to EOI, EIA, RFP, RFT, and Contract procurements documents via an open PSI in a system within a multiplicity of states and departments.en_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherRoyal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS)en_NZ
dc.relation.urihttp://www.rics.org/Global/Public%20Data%20Re-use%20Policy,%20but%20Not%20For%20Road%20Construction%20Procurement%20Documents%20in%20Australia.pdfen_NZ
dc.rights© RICS 2015en_NZ
dc.subjectAustraliaen_NZ
dc.subjectAustralian transport departmentsen_NZ
dc.subjectpublic sector information (PSI)en_NZ
dc.subjectpublic road procurementen_NZ
dc.subjectprocurement documentsen_NZ
dc.subjectconstruction project management (CPM)en_NZ
dc.titlePublic data re-use policy, but not for road construction in Australiaen_NZ
dc.typeConference Contribution - Paper in Published Proceedingsen_NZ
dc.rights.holderRoyal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS)en_NZ
dc.subject.marsden120201 Building Construction Management and Project Planningen_NZ
dc.subject.marsden120506 Transport Planningen_NZ
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationKenley, R., Harfield, T., & Bedggood, J. (2015, July). Public data re-use policy, but not for road construction in Australia. In Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (Ed.), Proceedings, Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors COBRA-AUBEA Joint International Conference (pp.11-18)en_NZ
unitec.institutionUnitec Institute of Technologyen_NZ
unitec.institutionSwinburne University of Technology (Victoria, Australia)en_NZ
unitec.publication.spage11en_NZ
unitec.publication.lpage18en_NZ
unitec.publication.titleCOBRA AUBEA 2015 Sydney, Australia 8 – 10 July 2015en_NZ
unitec.conference.titleRoyal Institution of Chartered Surveyors COBRA-AUBEA Construction, Building and Real Estate Research Conferenceen_NZ
unitec.conference.titleAUBEA Construction, Building and Real Estate Research Conferenceen_NZ
unitec.conference.orgConstruction, Building and Real Estate Research (COBRA)en_NZ
unitec.conference.orgAustralasian University Building Educators Association (AUBEA)en_NZ
unitec.conference.orgRoyal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS)en_NZ
unitec.conference.locationSydney (N.S.W.)en_NZ
unitec.conference.sdate2015-07-08
unitec.conference.edate2015-07-10
unitec.peerreviewedyesen_NZ
unitec.identifier.roms58648en_NZ


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in

Show simple record