Show simple record

dc.contributor.authorHorsburgh, Margaret
dc.contributor.authorBycroft, Janine
dc.contributor.authorMahony, Faith
dc.contributor.authorRoy, Dianne
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Denise
dc.contributor.authorGoodyear-Smith, Felicity
dc.contributor.authorDonnell, Erin
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-05T20:16:54Z
dc.date.available2011-12-05T20:16:54Z
dc.date.issued2010-12
dc.identifier.issn1172-6164
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10652/1739
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The Flinders Program(TM) has been adopted in New Zealand as a useful and appropriate approach for self-management with primary care clients who have chronic conditions. The Flinders Program(TM) has not been evaluated in New Zealand settings. Aim: To assess the feasibility of undertaking a substantive long-term trial to gauge the effectiveness of primary care nurses using the Flinders Program(TM) to improve health outcomes for New Zealand populations. Methods: A pilot study was undertaken considering four components of feasibility of conducting a long-term trial: practice recruitment, participant recruitment, delivery of the intervention and outcome measures. This included comparing 27 intervention and 30 control patients with long-term health conditions with respect to change in self-management capacity—Partners in Health (PIH) scale—quality of care using the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) scale and self-efficacy across six months. Intervention participants received care planning with practice nurses using the Flinders Program(TM) in general practices, while control participants received usual care in comparable practices. Results: General practice and participant recruitment was challenging, together with a lack of organisational capacity and resources in general practice for the Flinders Program(TM). The measures of self-management capacity (PIH), quality of care (PACIC) and self-efficacy were useful and valuable primary outcome measures. Discussion: The overall findings do not support a substantive trial of the Flinders Program(TM) in primary care. Difficulties associated with participant recruitment and ability of practice nurses to undertake the Flinders Program(TM) within general practice need to be resolved.en_NZ
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherRoyal New Zealand College of General Practitionersen_NZ
dc.relation.urihttps://www.rnzcgp.org.nz/assets/documents/Publications/JPHC/December-2010/JPHCOSPHorsburgh2Dec2010.pdfen_NZ
dc.subjectself-managementen_NZ
dc.subjectlong-term conditionsen_NZ
dc.subjectchronic conditionsen_NZ
dc.subjectchronic illnessesen_NZ
dc.subjectprimary careen_NZ
dc.subjectnursesen_NZ
dc.titleThe feasibility of assessing the Flinders Program(TM) of patient self-management in New Zealand primary care settingsen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Articleen_NZ
dc.rights.holderRoyal New Zealand College of General Practitionersen_NZ
dc.subject.marsden111002 Clinical Nursing: Primary (Preventative)en_NZ
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationHorsburgh, M., Bycroft, J., Mahony, F., Roy, D., Miller, D., Goodyear-Smith, F., & Donnell, E. (2010). Journal of Primary Health Care, 2(4), 294-302. Retrieved from http://www.rnzcgp.org.nzen_NZ
unitec.institutionUnitec Institute of Technologyen_NZ
unitec.institutionUniversity of Aucklanden_NZ
unitec.publication.spage294en_NZ
unitec.publication.lpage302en_NZ
unitec.publication.volume2en_NZ
unitec.publication.titleJournal of Primary Health Careen_NZ
unitec.peerreviewedyesen_NZ


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in

Show simple record