Research Bank

Varieties of Us: a case study in boundary and landscape in Aotearoa/New Zealand

Unitec Research Bank

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Woodruffe, Paul
dc.contributor.author Henderson, Ian
dc.date.accessioned 2011-08-31T23:49:09Z
dc.date.available 2011-08-31T23:49:09Z
dc.date.issued 2011-03-01
dc.identifier.issn 2043068X
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10652/1671
dc.description.abstract On Auckland‟s North Shore a narrow strip of cliff-top land overlooking the Hauraki Gulf includes a memorial park, historic WW2 defensive artefacts, Maori fortifications and a section of the New Zealand Walkway, and is edged by both historic public housing and private residences, with a diversity of boundary conditions and internal landscape treatments. Cadastral boundaries, the markers of surveyed legal ownership of land, are often understood as the determining elements of landscape conditions and treatments, whether intentionally designed or not. These particular edges limit the perception, attribution and design of the continuity of the landscape, and also of other possible boundaries or determinants of difference. This paper explores the signs, symbols and cues of territorial claim, ownership, occupancy, access, use and edge condition, to reveal a richness of landscape beyond the limitations of the duality of public/private based on cadastral lines or of the third space of in-between-ness, often seen as one of difference. Traditional indigenous Maori land occupation and guardianship may add a potential reinterpretation to this diversity, challenging these cadastral demarcations. The methodology “the everyday collective laboratory”, a graphic story telling of the landscape, is used to explore and illuminate the complex issues of territorial claim and boundary treatment discovered at the site. This is done by using a combination of mapping, fine art methodology, normative landscape architectural site analysis and graphic design to produce a document that is both analysis, and an informing of design potential through “representing the site as fields of relations rather than as arrangements of objects.” (Marot, 2003, p2. ). This methodology also enables memory to become a material and a dimension for landscape architecture within the suburban condition through its ability to draw out narrative. en_NZ
dc.language.iso en en_NZ
dc.publisher Intellect Ltd en_NZ
dc.relation.uri http://www.intellectbooks.co.uk/journals/view-Article,id=10633/ en_NZ
dc.rights The final version of this article is available from the publisher at www.intellectbooks.co.uk en_NZ
dc.subject Cadastral boundaries en_NZ
dc.subject Territorial claims en_NZ
dc.subject Landscape en_NZ
dc.subject In-between-ness en_NZ
dc.subject Everyday collective laboratory en_NZ
dc.title Varieties of Us: a case study in boundary and landscape in Aotearoa/New Zealand en_NZ
dc.type Journal Article en_NZ
dc.rights.holder Intellect Ltd en_NZ
dc.identifier.doi 10.1386/des.1.1.135_7 en_NZ
dc.subject.marsden 120107 Landscape Architecture en_NZ
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation Woodruffe, P, & Henderson, I. (2011). Varieties of us: A case study in boundary and landscape in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Design Ecologies, 1(1), 135-152. doi: 10.1386/des.1.1.135_7 en_NZ
unitec.institution Unitec Institute of Technology en_NZ
unitec.publication.spage 135 en_NZ
unitec.publication.lpage 152 en_NZ
unitec.publication.volume 1 en_NZ
unitec.publication.title Design Ecologies en_NZ
unitec.peerreviewed yes en_NZ


This item appears in

Show simple item record